Keywords: family, young marriage, values, conflict, conflict situation, compromise, adaptation, rivalry, avoidance, cooperation, respect


The article deals with the concept of marital conflict. The family is considered as a social institution. Identified marital conflicts that occur more often, as well as the most important causes of family conflicts. The views of scientists involved in the study of this problem are analyzed. The analysis of scientific and psychological literature on the problem under investigation is covered. A corrected program «Resolution of marital conflicts and harmonization of family relations» was formed and tested, the task of which is to acquaint the couple with the concept of «conflict»; ability to manage conflict situations; teach to appreciate your partner and help each other; develop forms and skills of personal communication, ways of understanding. The results of their own empirical study of role expectations and claims in the married couple are presented. Graphically in percentages, results are shown using the method «Role expectations and harassment in marriage» (ROD) AN Volkova Comparatively significant difference between the indicators of the observational and experimental research, after the introduction of correctional program. The effectiveness of the correction program is analyzed. It is proved that the prevention of family conflicts depends, first of all, on the marriage. The ways of resolving conflicts are determined. It is noted that after the introduction of corrective measures, a reduction in the indicators of conflict on the parental educational scale, which diagnoses the satisfaction of individual needs in parenthood and parenthood and self-realization of the individual in children, is revealed. It is also noted that after the molding experiment, the percentage of partners, satisfied with the way of existence and development of the personality of another partner as a subject of public life, increased.

Author Biographies

Taisiia Tkachuk, SHEI «Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University»

Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Applied Psychology Department of the SHEI «Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University»

Anastasiya Ishenko, SHEI «Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University»

student of Pedagogic Department of the SHEI «Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University»


Hryshyna, 2012 – Hryshyna N. V. Psykholohyia konflykta. SPb. : Pyter, 2012. 464 s.

Dutkevych, 2005 – Dutkevych T. V. Konfliktolohiia z osnovamy psykholohii upravlinnia : navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv : Tsentr navchalnoi literatury, 2005. 256 s.

Karnehy, 2004 – Karnehy D. Kak zavoevat druzei / per. s anhl. Z. P. Volskoi, Yu. V. Semenova. Donetsk : «Yzdatelstvo Stalker», 2004. 560 s.

Kochetov, 1989 – Kochetov A. Y. Nachalo semeinoi zhyzny. Mynsk : «Polыmia», 1987. 224 s.

Piren, 2007 – Piren M. I. Konfliktolohiia : Pidruchnyk. Kyiv; MAUP, 2007. 360 s.

Raihorodskyi, 2002 – Raihorodskyi D. Ya. Praktycheskaia psykhodyahnostyka. Metodyky y testы : uchebnoe posobye. Samara : «BAKhRAKh-M», 2002. 672 s.

Sуsenko, 1989 – Sуsenko V. A. Supruzheskye konflyktу. Moskva : Mуsl, 1989. 173 s.

Kharchenko, 2007 – Kharchenko S. V. Osobennosty obshchenyia muzhchyn y zhenshchyn. Praktychna psykholohiia ta sotsialna robota. 2007. № 4. S. 12–16.

Shneider, 2000 – Shneider L. B. Psykholohyia semeinуkh otnoshenyi. Kurs lektsyi. Moskva : Aprel-Press, Yzd-vo ЕKSMO-Press, 2000. 512 s.

How to Cite
Tkachuk, T., & Ishenko, A. (2019). ПСИХОЛОГІЧНІ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ВЗАЄМОДІЇ ПОДРУЖЖЯ В КОНФЛІКТНИХ СИТУАЦІЯХ. HUMANITARIUM, 42(1), 173-180. Retrieved from https://humanitarium.com.ua/index.php/hum/article/view/268